AWS Certified AI Practitioner Practice Exam

What is the most effective way for a company to evaluate models in Amazon Bedrock to ensure they align with employee preferences?

1. Evaluate the models by using built-in prompt datasets

2. Evaluate the models by using a human workforce and custom prompt datasets

3. Use public model leaderboards to identify the model

4. Use the model InvocationLatency runtime metrics in Amazon CloudWatch when trying models

The correct answer is: Evaluate the models by using a human workforce and custom prompt datasets

Evaluating models using a human workforce and custom prompt datasets is an effective approach because it allows for a nuanced understanding of how well the models perform in real-world scenarios that align with employee preferences. By engaging human evaluators, companies can gather qualitative feedback on the models that automated evaluations might overlook. Custom prompt datasets can be tailored specifically to the organization's context, ensuring that the evaluation criteria and scenarios are relevant to the employees' typical tasks and preferences. This human-centric approach aids in identifying strengths and weaknesses in the model's performance, ultimately ensuring that the models are not only technically sound but also user-friendly and aligned with the needs of the intended users. Using built-in prompt datasets lacks customization and may not reflect the specific context and requirements of the organization, making it less suitable for assessing employee preferences comprehensively. Public model leaderboards primarily showcase model performance on general tasks but do not provide insights into specific employee needs or preferences. Utilizing model invocation latency metrics can give insight into performance efficiency but does not directly assess how well the models match employee preferences or real-world applicability. Therefore, the human workforce coupled with custom datasets offers a holistic evaluation that aligns closely with employee interests.